karanasios

I mean, you could put in a part that's like, Brian wanted to save the world, keep the towns identity, peg wanted to hook up with brian

winberg

vietulilto, virtaluoto, ok, so long terms and learning ok, so that would mean we're definitely including the poop , but still no tool, I mean, we're def acting with technology, but again it seems like the acting with technology is preserving the past, so if we think about this at the level of why rather than what or how, then the tool is lamp, which makes sense , but excluded from view is brian's backdoor dealings with his friends at loews or whatever, and similar ly excluded is...

mcnair, remember the entire system is the uoa, so...does this mean it includes the future and poo??? we go into the workshop sure and ...so I guess this analysis would focus on how the work became an activity, ... it would just be so much better if there was a tool that mediated everything, aside from the lamp mediating them to their own culture

learning mech, also the expansion of at ie , rules, division of l, etc

wang

priority goes to activity

decisions

see, chat is not amazing appropriate for this example since it's all new , there's nothing regularized except for the recurrent attempt to stave off the elimination of the past (roy)

def no internal/external in ant, no development either...

hierarchical vs. ant which is horizontal (roy)

both means and object, again like dewey

mediation

ok, so looks at the examples above, you will not have cm in your paper, that's not what's wonderous about the example, what's wonderous is the hybridity?? how people work together to save????? these lamps...create worth?? value???? solve a problem that is problematized by being in multiple spheres of value

two options, I feel like you can change the story so that tools play a bigger part or you can make the lamps be an extension of the people themselves, (but even as I'm thinking of this, should we begin with a breakdown? ie , the gas getting expensive and 2008???)